<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holt &#8211; 7. The Burden of Having Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atypicalhomeschool.net/on-books/holt-7-the-burden-of-having-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atypicalhomeschool.net/on-books/holt-7-the-burden-of-having-children/</link>
	<description>my personal space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Wiesler</title>
		<link>http://atypicalhomeschool.net/on-books/holt-7-the-burden-of-having-children/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Wiesler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atypicalhomeschool.net/on-books/holt-7-the-burden-of-having-children/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Elaborating on Andreas comment about marketing: there is a further problem to this. Most &quot;child-nutrition&quot; would fall into the group of sweets (though often cleverly disguised as healthy snacks with lots of milk...), containing far too much sugar and fat. And artificial flavour. Not only does that make the kids fat, but the artificial flavours conditionate the kids to a certain brand, make them &quot;loyal customers&quot; for the rest of their life for the kids believe that a peach has to taste the way it tastes in Jell-o (or whatever). there have been tests where kids could not name the fruits by tasting them blind! Simply because a real apple does not at all taste like the &quot;appleflavour&quot; used in many foods. 
Not to talk about allergies etc that can (and do) arise from bombarding the childs system with artificial products. Why don&#039;t they put Narnia on a fresh apple?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elaborating on Andreas comment about marketing: there is a further problem to this. Most &#8220;child-nutrition&#8221; would fall into the group of sweets (though often cleverly disguised as healthy snacks with lots of milk&#8230;), containing far too much sugar and fat. And artificial flavour. Not only does that make the kids fat, but the artificial flavours conditionate the kids to a certain brand, make them &#8220;loyal customers&#8221; for the rest of their life for the kids believe that a peach has to taste the way it tastes in Jell-o (or whatever). there have been tests where kids could not name the fruits by tasting them blind! Simply because a real apple does not at all taste like the &#8220;appleflavour&#8221; used in many foods.<br />
Not to talk about allergies etc that can (and do) arise from bombarding the childs system with artificial products. Why don&#8217;t they put Narnia on a fresh apple?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

